TMTC How to Build Team Culture With A Small Leadership Team

How to Build Team Culture With A Small Leadership Team

 

Most management advice assumes a certain scale. Team-building exercises, away days, layered communication cascades, all of it is built for organisations with dozens of managers and hundreds of staff. For the smaller independent school, where the senior leadership group might consist of three or four heads of department, that advice doesn’t just feel unhelpful, it feels like it was written for a different job entirely.

An organisation with a head of department team this size faces a different set of challenges to a larger education organisation, not a smaller version of the same ones. Building shared identity and a working culture among three or four people who see each other daily, and who often cover for each other when someone is off sick or on a course, requires a different approach altogether.

Why the usual approach doesn’t transfer

Conventional team culture-building assumes some distance between people, roles that don’t overlap too heavily, and enough headcount that individual personalities can be balanced out across a wider group. In a team of three or four, none of that holds. Each person’s working style has an outsized effect on the whole team’s dynamic. There’s no cover if one relationship in the group is strained, and traditional exercises designed to build trust among strangers land oddly among people who already know each other’s coffee order.

The result is often that smaller organisations quietly opt out of any deliberate culture-building at all, on the assumption that it doesn’t apply to them. That’s the real risk. A small team without a shared sense of purpose and identity doesn’t stay neutral, iIt tends to drift into whoever is loudest, or whoever has been there longest, setting the tone by default rather than by design.

What actually works at this scale

The starting point isn’t a programme or an away day, it’s a genuine conversation about what the school values, and what that means in practice for how the department heads work with each other.

Our founder, Tracy-Anne Barker, has run this conversation with several smaller independent schools, and the pattern is consistent. It rarely starts as a values conversation, it usually starts as a scheduling problem, a disagreement about resourcing, or one head of department feeling unsupported by another. The values conversation is what gets underneath that, asking not “what should we do differently” but “what do we actually agree matters here, and are we behaving as if it does.”

For a team this size, a few things make the difference:

  • Naming the values explicitly, together, rather than inheriting them from a staff handbook. A team of three or four can genuinely co-author a shared set of working principles in a single session, in a way a team of twenty cannot.
  • Being specific about behaviour, not just intent. “We support each other” means little until it’s translated into something concrete, such as how cover requests are handled, or how disagreements are raised.
  • Protecting time to have the conversation at all. In a small team, everyone is close to the day-to-day pressure. Without a deliberate pause, the conversation simply doesn’t happen, because there’s always something more urgent.
  • Revisiting it, briefly, rather than treating it as a one-off. A short check-in each term keeps the agreed values live rather than filed away.

None of this requires scale. It requires structure, and it requires someone facilitating who isn’t inside the day-to-day dynamic of the team.

The business case for getting this right

For the senior leadership team or HR lead weighing up whether this is worth prioritising, the answer sits in retention and workload. A head of department team that isn’t functioning as a team places more pressure on senior leadership to mediate, more strain on the individuals carrying disagreement without a shared framework to resolve it, and a higher risk of losing a head of department altogether, with all the disruption that brings to the department and the pupils in it.

Investing in a short, well-facilitated values conversation among three or four people is a modest cost against that risk, and it addresses the culture question directly rather than leaving it to chance.

Where to start

Smaller independent education organisations don’t need a scaled-down version of a large-organisation culture programme. They need an approach built for their size from the outset, one that takes seriously how much weight each individual relationship carries when the team is this small.

If this challenge sounds familiar, a confidential conversation with Tracy-Anne is the place to start.

JOIN LESSONS IN LEADERSHIP

Every Friday a bite sized, quick read, will drop into your inbox, so that you can keep up with everything educational management over  coffee. Each edition is packed with hints and tips, actionable advice, enlightenment, and perhaps a gentle nudge to remind you of the excellence you’re capable of.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top